ProjectDisaster: Disasters, Terrorism, Preparedness, Emerging Infections, Response, Mitigation

Search ProjectDisaster:

Choose a Topic:

June 10th, 2012 posted by Paul Rega, MD, FACEP June 10, 2012 @ 12:22 pm

Breaking news: Suicide car bomb kills at least 5 in Nigeria

CNN, 6/10/12:  “Witnesses say at least five killed by suicide car bomb during Sunday services
at church in Jos, Nigeria.”

http://edition.cnn.com



Email This Post Email This Post

Comments Off

June 10th, 2012 posted by Paul Rega, MD, FACEP @ 12:20 pm

FEMA SitRep, 6/10/12: Wildfires and Flooding

Uncategorized

Read


Email This Post Email This Post

Comments Off

June 10th, 2012 posted by Paul Rega, MD, FACEP @ 6:09 am

US Weather: Live!!

Uncategorized





Email This Post Email This Post

Comments Off

June 10th, 2012 posted by Paul Rega, MD, FACEP @ 6:08 am

Wildfire in northern Colorado

Uncategorized

AP

FORT COLLINS, Colo. (AP) — “Crews are battling a wildfire in northern Colorado that has scorched 5,000 acres and prompted several dozen evacuation orders……”



Email This Post Email This Post

Comments Off

June 10th, 2012 posted by Paul Rega, MD, FACEP @ 5:46 am

Death threats against prosecutors of alleged domestic terrorist group

Uncategorized

Orlando Sentinel

White supremacists threaten state attorney, judge, agent

By Henry Pierson Curtis, Orlando Sentinel
4:55 p.m. EST, June 8, 2012

ST. CLOUD – “Central figures in the prosecution of the American Front white supremacy group have received death threats on several websites in recent weeks……So far, 13 men and women have been charged and one suspect remains at large in what has become one the largest U.S. domestic terrorism cases in more than a decade. Unlike most cases with one to four defendants, the 14 accused American Front members include nine charged with conspiring to attack an undisclosed target…..”



Email This Post Email This Post

Comments Off

June 10th, 2012 posted by Paul Rega, MD, FACEP @ 5:38 am

FEMA: Caring for Your Pet After a Disaster

Uncategorized

Caring for Your Pet After a Disaster


Email This Post Email This Post

Comments Off

June 10th, 2012 posted by Paul Rega, MD, FACEP @ 5:38 am

FDA, NIOSH and OSHA Joint Safety Communication on Blunt-Tip Surgical Suture Needles

Uncategorized

http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm305757.htm

FDA, NIOSH and OSHA Joint Safety Communication: Blunt-Tip Surgical Suture Needles Reduce Needlestick Injuries and the Risk of Subsequent Bloodborne Pathogen Transmission to Surgical Personnel

Date Issued: May 30, 2012

Audience: Surgeons, Operating Room Supervisors, Perioperative Nurses, Hospital Administrators, Hospital Risk Managers, Occupational Health & Safety Managers, Infection Preventionists, Surgeon Educators, Surgical Residents, Medical School Administrators/Faculty, and other Personnel

Medical Specialties: General Surgery, Urology, Obstetrics/Gynecology, Orthopedics, Anesthesiology, Surgical Technology, and any specialty that includes surgery of the muscle or fascia

Purpose: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) strongly encourage health care professionals to use blunt-tip suture needles as an alternative to standard suture needles when suturing fascia and muscle to decrease the risk of needlestick injury.

Blunt-Tip Suture Needles:
Image of Blunt-tip Suture Needle. Blunt-tip suture needles (Figure 1), which are not as sharp as standard (sharp-tip) suture needles, are designed to penetrate muscle and fascia and reduce the risk of needlesticks. Blunt-tip suture needles are regulated by the FDA and have been marketed in the U.S. for more than 25 years.

Summary of Problem and Scope:
Needlestick injuries continue to occur in surgical settings when suturing muscle and fascia, despite the availability of safety-engineered devices, such as blunt-tip suture needles, and the endorsement of their use by professional organizations.

Needlestick injuries have the potential to expose health care personnel to bloodborne viruses, such as Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). Of the estimated 384,000 needlestick injuries occurring in hospitals each year, 23 percent occur in surgical settings.1 Published literature indicates that while needlestick injury rates have been decreasing among non-surgical health care providers, this has not been the case among those who work in surgical settings. According to a 2010 article published in the Association of periOperative Registered Nurses Journal, more than half of needlestick injuries involving suture needles occur during the suturing of fascia or muscle.2

Benefits of Using Blunt-Tip Suture Needles:
Published studies show that using blunt-tip suture needles reduces the risk of needlestick injuries from suture needles by 69 percent.3 Although blunt-tip suture needles currently cost some 70 cents more than their standard suture needle counterparts, the benefits of reducing the risk of serious and potentially fatal bloodborne infections for health care personnel support their use when clinically appropriate.

A 2007 report suggests that the slight difference in costs of blunt- and sharp-tip suture needles is balanced by the economic savings associated with needlestick injury prevention. This report, which assessed the costs of managing occupational exposures to blood and body fluids, concluded that the cost of managing a needlestick injury can range from $376 to $2,456 per reported incident.4 In addition, personnel who receive needlestick injuries may experience anxiety and a loss of productivity as they await the results of blood tests.

Government Agencies and Professional Organizations Endorse the Use of Blunt-Tip Suture Needles:
The OSHA Bloodborne Pathogens standard2, revised on Jan.18, 2001 in response to the Needlestick Safety and Prevention Act of 20003, requires the use of safer devices, such as blunt-tip suture needles, when clinically appropriate, to reduce the risk of needlestick injury and subsequent pathogen transmission to personnel. The revised standard requires employers, with input from non-managerial direct patient care employees, to consider and implement available appropriate and effective safer medical devices designed to eliminate or minimize occupational exposure.

In 2007, OSHA and NIOSH issued a joint Safety and Health Information Bulletin4 emphasizing OSHA’s requirement and NIOSH’s recommendation to use blunt-tip suture needles, when clinically appropriate, to decrease needlestick injuries to surgical personnel.

The American College of Surgeons (ACS)5 recommends the universal adoption of blunt-tip suture needles as the first choice for the closure of fascia and muscle. This statement is endorsed by the Association of periOperative Registered Nurses, American Association of Nurse Anesthetists, American Association of Surgical Physician Assistants, American Society of Anesthesiologists, American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses, and Association of Surgical Technologists.

In addition, the 2011 Viral Hepatitis Action Plan6 issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services recommends the use of blunt-tip suture needles, when clinically appropriate, to help reduce device-related needlestick exposures among health care personnel.

Recommendation:
The FDA, NIOSH, and OSHA strongly encourage health care professionals in surgical settings to use blunt-tip suture needles to suture muscle and fascia, when clinically appropriate, to reduce the risk of needlestick injury and subsequent pathogen transmission to surgical personnel.

Reporting Occupational Needlestick Injuries:
When an employee reports a sharps injury to their employer, the OSHA Bloodborne Pathogens standard requires the employer to record the injury, make immediately available to the employee a confidential medical evaluation and provide follow-up, and investigate and document the circumstances and type of device involved. The employer can use this information to assist in preventing similar injuries in the future. Needlestick injuries must be documented as required in OSHA’s Recordkeeping standard (29 CFR 1904.87).

In addition, OSHA’s Bloodborne Pathogens standard (29 CFR 1910.1030(h)(5)) states that any employer required to keep occupational injuries and illnesses records under 29 CFR 1904 must maintain a sharps injury log8 to record needlestick injuries. The sharps injury log should contain, at a minimum, the following information:

Furthermore, prompt reporting of adverse events can help the FDA identify and better understand the risks associated with medical devices. If you suspect a problem with suture needles (sharp and blunt), we encourage you to file a voluntary report through MedWatch, the FDA Safety Information and Adverse Event Reporting program9. Health care personnel employed by facilities that are subject to FDA’s user facility reporting requirements10 should follow the reporting procedures established by their facilities. Additional information about types of needlestick adverse events to report to the FDA is available at Needlesticks – Medical Device Reporting Guidance for User Facilities, Manufacturers and Importers11.

To help the FDA learn as much as possible about the adverse events associated with suture needles, please include the following information in your reports, if available:

Contact Information:
If you have questions about OSHA’s Bloodborne Pathogens standard and its requirement to use safer devices to prevent needlestick injuries, contact OSHA’s Directorate of Technical Support and Emergency Management at 1-800-321-6742 or 202-693-2300.

If you have questions about this communication, please contact FDA’s Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance (DSMICA) at DSMICA@FDA.HHS.GOV, 1-800-638-2041, or 301-796-7100.

Additional Links:


1Jagger J, Berguer R, Phillips EK, Parker G, Gomaa AE. Increase in sharps injuries in surgical settings versus nonsurgical settings after passage of national needlestick legislation. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2010;210:496-502.

2Jagger J, Bentley M, and Tereskerz P. A study of patterns and prevention of blood exposures in OR personnel. Association of periOperative Registered Nurses Journal. 1998;67(5):979-96.

3Parantainen A, Verbeek JH, Lavoie MC, Pahwa M. Blunt versus sharp suture needles for preventing percutaneous exposure incidents in surgical staff. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011;Issue 11. Art. No.: CD009170. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009170.pub2.

4O’Malley EM, Scott RD 2nd, Gayle J, et al. Costs of management of occupational exposures to blood and body fluids. Infection Control Hospital Epidemiology. 2007; 28(7):774-82.

 



Email This Post Email This Post

Comments Off

June 10th, 2012 posted by Paul Rega, MD, FACEP @ 5:37 am

Medical Research on Near-Hanging Cases in Iran

Uncategorized

Epidemiology and Prognostic Factors in Cases of Near hanging Presenting to a
Referral Hospital in Arak, Iran
Published online: 06 June 2012
Hassan Solhi, Shirin Pazoki, Omid Mehrpour, Sam Alfred
DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.09.035
Journal of Emergency Medicine, The, http://www.jem-journal.com/article/S0736-4679%2812%2900354-X/abstract

The aim of this study:   To determine the epidemiology and characteristics of near-hanging patients admitted to the main referral hospital in Arak, Iran.

Results during the 9-year study period:

*43 cases of near hanging were identified.

* The patients were all male

* Mean age of 24.2 years (range: 12–38 years).

* The median GCS at presentation was 6 (range: 3–12)

* Cervical spine fracture of C2 was observed in two cases (4%).

* 62.7% of patients had an abnormal brain computed tomography scan, with brain edema being the most common finding (n=16, 37.2%), followed by subdural hematoma (n=10, 23.3%).

* Ophthalmologic examination demonstrated retinal bleeding in 24 patients (55.8%).

* 4 inpatient deaths among the study group

* 39 patients survived to discharge

* A mortality rate of 9.3%.

* Findings on presentation associated with subsequent mortality included a systolic blood pressure<90mm Hg, GCS<5, retinal bleeding, and pulmonary edema.



Email This Post Email This Post

Comments Off



Get Macromedia Flash Player

Flash Player Uninstaller - uninstall if you have trouble updating or installing the new flash player, then try to install the flash player again
Syndicate this site using RSS RSS Feed
FindBlogs.com

Conditions and Diseases Blog Directory

ProjectDisaster at Blogged