ProjectDisaster: Disasters, Terrorism, Preparedness, Emerging Infections, Response, Mitigation

Search ProjectDisaster:

Choose a Topic:

April 30th, 2012 posted by Paul Rega, MD, FACEP April 30, 2012 @ 12:12 pm

The journey into terrorism; Why?

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/30/nyregion/testimony-of-4-admitted-terrorists-gives-a-rare-view-of-al-qaeda.html?nl=nyregion&emc=edit_ur_20120430

NY Times

In Terrorists’ Testimony, a Rare, Intimate Look Into a Secretive World

By MOSI SECRET

“…..The testimony of the four men — Zarein Ahmedzay, Saajid Badat, Bryant Neal Vinas and Najibullah Zazi…. provided a detailed and unusually human window into a normally secretive world, as each man described the journey that led him to the cusp of committing mass murder on behalf of Al Qaeda…… They were all young Muslim men living in the West who were influenced by the fiery preaching of radical clerics: most often by Anwar al-Awlaki, who called on all Muslims to take up arms.

All of them traveled to the Middle East to fight against American troops in protest of what they viewed as the occupation of Afghanistan. They were all recruited to terrorist training camps, where they were told by Qaeda leaders that their passports made them far more valuable as suicide bombers back home, and they all struggled with the moral implications of their actions as they prepared to kill as many people as possible….”



Email This Post Email This Post

Comments Off

April 30th, 2012 posted by Paul Rega, MD, FACEP @ 12:02 pm

CDC: Measles in America, a 15-year high

Uncategorized

http://www.acepnews.com/e-newsletters/acep-news-e-newsletter/singleview120429/98cc6805080f9641f8899df7dcb36e21.html?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=1263

2011: Measles Cases, Outbreaks in U.S. Hit 15-Year High

By: DIANA MAHONEY, Elsevier Global Medical News

“…..A total of 222 measles cases and 17 measles outbreaks from 31 states were reported to the CDC in 2011, compared with a median of 60 cases and 4 outbreaks reported annually during 2001-2010……. Of the 222 cases, 200 (90%) were associated with importations from other countries, including 52 (26%) cases in U.S. residents who had recently traveled abroad and 20 (10%) in foreign visitors…. presenting data from the April 20 Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2012;61:253-7). ….”



Email This Post Email This Post

Comments Off

April 30th, 2012 posted by Paul Rega, MD, FACEP @ 11:58 am

STEMIs False Activations

Uncategorized

http://www.acepnews.com/e-newsletters/acep-news-e-newsletter/singleview120429/9d1f5cd7addf289ce4319a77d4be3a06.html?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=1269

http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/reprint/59/13_Suppl_S/E358.pdf

Door-to-Balloon Time Cuts Spiked False Activations

By: MITCHEL L. ZOLER, Elsevier Global Medical News

CHICAGO – “Recent cuts in the door-to-balloon time for treating patients hospitalized with an acute myocardial infarction came with the cost of increased “false alarm” activations of the hospital’s emergency coronary-catheterization laboratory team.

At the University of Michigan, the rate of coronary-catheterization lab activations that proved unnecessary because patients did not have ST-elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMI) jumped from 23% of all activations in 2007 to 48% in 2011……  This spike in false-alarm activations coincided with a reduction in the average time to route patients with suspected STEMI from their entry to the hospital’s emergency department to the catheterization lab to start their percutaneous intervention (the “door-to-balloon” time) from 73 minutes in 2007 to 64 minutes in 2011. ……”



Email This Post Email This Post

Comments Off

April 30th, 2012 posted by Paul Rega, MD, FACEP @ 11:54 am

ER attitudes towards drunks

Uncategorized

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22525698

J Emerg Med. 2012 Apr 21. [Epub ahead of print]
Emergency Physicians’ and Nurses’ Attitudes towards Alcohol-Intoxicated Patients.
Warren OU, Sena V, Choo E, Machan J.
 
Physicians were less satisfied and more dissatisfied than nurses when caring for alcohol-intoxicated patients. Physicians found treating alcohol-intoxicated patients more difficult than nurses did. Physicians were more likely to agree that alcohol-intoxicated patients should be treated with respect. Physicians felt more adequately trained than nurses in caring for alcohol-intoxicated patients. Nurses were more likely to believe that alcohol-related rehabilitation is ineffective compared with physicians. Both nurses and physicians refer alcohol-intoxicated patients to rehabilitation to a similar extent.


Email This Post Email This Post

Comments Off

April 30th, 2012 posted by Paul Rega, MD, FACEP @ 11:45 am

FEMA SitRep, 4/30/12

Uncategorized

Read


Email This Post Email This Post

Comments Off

April 30th, 2012 posted by Paul Rega, MD, FACEP @ 12:04 am

CDC: Pneumococcus & the Vaccine

Uncategorized

http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/surv-manual/chpt11-pneumo.html

Chapter 11: Pneumococcal

 
 Manual for the Surveillance of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases (5th Edition, 2012)

Authors: Chad M. Cox, MD, Ruth Link-Gelles, MPH

 

Disease Description

Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus) is a gram-positive bacterium with more than 90 known serotypes.  Pneumococcus is spread by airborne droplets and is a leading cause of serious illness, including bacteremia, meningitis, and pneumonia among children and adults worldwide.[1], [2]  Although all serotypes may cause serious disease, a relatively limited number of serotypes cause the majority of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD).

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Active Bacterial Core Surveillance (ABCs) has tracked IPD in selected regions of the United States since 1994. ABCs data indicate that individuals aged <2 years and ≥65 years have the highest rates of invasive disease (Table 1).[2], [3]   Approximately 10% of all patients with invasive pneumococcal disease die of their illness, but case-fatality rates are higher for the elderly and patients with certain underlying illnesses. [3], [4]

Table 1. Incidence of pneumococcal infections in the United States.

Age (years) Disease Incidence Cases/100,000 (number of cases) Death Rate Deaths/100,000 (number of deaths)
<1 31.4 (142) 0.22 (1)
1 24.6 (112) 0.22 (1)
2-4 12.6 (171) 0.15 (2)
5-17 2.2. (111) 0.02 (1)
18-34 3.7 (261) 0.26 (18)
35-49 10.3 (670) 0.65 (42)
50-64 19.5 (1,068) 1.86 (102)
≥ 65 37.0 (1,291) 5.61 (196)
Total 12.9 (3,828) 1.22 (363)

Each year in the United States, pneumococcal disease accounts for a substantial number of cases of invasive and non-invasive disease including meningitis, bacteremia, pneumonia, and acute otitis media (AOM).[3-8]  A recent analysis estimated that pneumococcal disease was responsible for 4 million illness episodes, 445,000 hospitalizations and 22,000 deaths annually.[9]   Pneumococcal disease is preceded by asymptomatic colonization of the nasopharynx which tends to be especially common in children.[10]  Acute otitis media (AOM) is the most common clinical manifestation of pneumococcal infection among children and the most common outpatient diagnosis resulting in antibiotic prescriptions in that group.[11]

Background

Pneumococcal vaccines

Two different types of pneumococcal vaccines, polysaccharide and conjugate vaccines, are employed in the prevention of pneumococcal disease.  Polysaccharide vaccines contain capsular pneumococcal polysaccharide antigens, while conjugate vaccines contain an immunogenic nonpneumococcal protein conjugated to individual pneumococcal polysaccharides.

A pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV) targeting 23 of the most common serotypes of S. pneumoniae has been available since 1983. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends that it be administered to persons ³2 years of age who have any of several underlying medical conditions and to all persons >65 years of age.[5], [12]

In February 2000, a 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) was licensed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use among infants and young children.  In pre-licensure randomized trials, PCV7 was demonstrated to be safe and highly efficacious against invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), moderately efficacious against pneumonia, and somewhat effective in reducing otitis media episodes and related office visits.[13-15] On the basis of the results of these clinical trials, in 2000, ACIP recommended routine use of PCV7 for all children aged 2-23 months and for children aged 24-59 months who are at increased risk for pneumococcal disease (e.g., children with anatomic or functional asplenia, sickle cell disease (SCD), HIV infection or other immunocom­promising condition, or chronic illness including chronic heart or lung disease, cerebrospinal fluid leaks, and diabetes mellitus).[11]  In 2007, the ACIP revised its recommendation for routine use to include all children aged 2-59 months.[16]

In February, 2010, a new 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) was approved by the  FDA and has now replaced PCV7.[17]  PCV13 is formulated and manufactured using the same processes as PCV7 and was licensed by FDA on the basis of studies demonstrating safety and ability comparable to that of PCV7 to elicit antibodies protective against IPD.  PCV13 is made by the same manufacturer as PCV7 and contains the seven serotypes included in PCV7 (4, 6B, 9V, 14, 18C, 19F and 23F) as well as six additional serotypes (1, 3, 5, 6A, 7F and 19A).  PCV13 is approved for prevention of IPD among infants and young children caused by the 13 serotypes in the vaccine.  It is also approved for the prevention of otitis media caused by the seven serotypes covered by PCV7; however, no efficacy data for prevention of otitis media are available for the six additional serotypes.

Trends in invasive pneumococcal disease

Following the introduction of PCV7 in 2000, dramatic declines in invasive pneumococcal disease were reported among children aged <5 years as early as 2001. Before introduction of PCV7, rates of PC7-type invasive pneumococcal disease among children in this age were around 80 cases per 100,000 population.  After the introduction of PCV7, rates of disease due to these 7 serotypes dropped dramatically to less than 1 case per 100,000 by 2007 (Figure 1).

 
graph of PCV7 serotypes, PCV6(6 serotypes unique to PCV13), and non-vaccine serotypes cases per 100,000 by year, as discussed in Trends in invasive pneumococcal disease section

Figure 1. Rates of invasive pneumococcal disease among children aged <5 years, 1998-2010*

*Active Bacterial Core Surveillance data 1998-2010, unpublished

The use of PCV7 also reduced the burden of invasive pneumococcal disease among older children and adults through reduced transmission of vaccine serotype pneumococci (herd protection). Declines in the incidence of PCV7-type invasive disease among adults were observed as early as 2001 and have continued since that time, reducing the incidence to 64-77% below the 1998-1999 baselines, depending on age.[18-20] Increases in disease caused by serotypes not included in PCV7 (i.e., replacement disease) are evident in children and certain adult populations with underlying illnesses but are small in magnitude compared with the overall reduction in disease.[21], [22]  With the introduction of PCV13, it is anticipated that cases of invasive disease due to the 6 additional serotypes covered by the vaccine will decrease.

Antimicrobial resistance trends

Before 1990, S. pneumoniae was almost uniformly susceptible to penicillin, allowing most physicians to treat persons with severe infections with penicillin alone. However, during the 1990’s, resistance to penicillin and to multiple classes of antimicrobial agents spread rapidly in the United States with an increasing trend of invasive pneumococci resistant to 3 or more drug classes.[23-26]

Following the introduction of PCV7 into the routine childhood immunization program in 2000, the incidence of antibiotic-resistant invasive disease declined substantially among both young children and older persons.[20], [27-31] Between 1998-99 and 2008, penicillin-nonsusceptible IPD rates declined 64% for children aged <5 years and 45% for adults aged ≥65 years.[31]  An increase in penicillin-nonsusceptible disease caused by serotypes not included in PCV7 was also identified during the same time period, although the magnitude of this effect remains small.[27] The prevalence of resistance varied by geographic area both before and after PCV7 introduction, with higher prevalence noted for the southeastern U.S. [23], [27] During 2007-08, serotypes unique to PCV13 (i.e., serotypes contained in PCV13 but not PCV7) caused 78-97% of penicillin-nonsusceptible IPD, depending on age.[31]  With the introduction of PCV13 in 2010, further reductions in antibiotic-nonsusceptible IPD rates are anticipated.

In 2008, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) established new, higher minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) breakpoints for defining pneumococcal susceptibility to parenterally administered penicillin when treating non-meningitic pneumococcal disease.[32]  Regardless of whether the old or new parenteral penicillin breakpoints are used, penicillin-nonsusceptible IPD caused by PCV7 serotypes has decreased significantly for all age groups and has almost disappeared except among adults aged ≥65 years.  Under the new parenteral breakpoints, rates of penicillin-nonsusceptible IPD remain markedly below the rates that existed before PCV7 introduction for all age groups except adults aged 50-64 years.[31

The emergence of drug resistant S. pneumoniae (DRSP) has made treatment of pneumococcal disease more difficult. Because of a lack of rapid, sensitive, and specific diagnostic tests, therapy for pneumonia and milder illnesses such as otitis media remains empiric. Groups of experts have provided national guidance for treating infections commonly caused by pneumococcus, such as otitis media and pneumonia, because of the increasing prevalence of DRSP. [33-36] Few communities exist in which resistance remains uncommon and even in these communities, resistant infections can occur. For these reasons, clinicians and public health officials should follow national guidelines rather than attempt to create local treatment recommendations based on local resistance data. Due to the limitations of current diagnostic testing, clinicians often prescribe empiric antibacterial therapy that is not indicated or is unnecessarily broad. Inappropriate antimicrobial use contributes to the development of DRSP. Principles have been developed to encourage appropriate use of antimicrobial agents for adults and children with upper respiratory infections. [6], [37-40]

 

Importance of Surveillance

Surveillance for invasive pneumococcal disease has four main goals:

With the recent introduction of PCV13, surveillance for invasive pneumococcal disease among children aged < 5 years is particularly important for identifying populations that may not be receiving vaccination and for monitoring the incidence of disease caused by non-vaccine serotypes (i.e., replacement disease). Surveillance for invasive pneumococcal disease in persons ³5 years is useful to monitor the impact of PPV vaccination, the indirect effects of PCV13, and replacement disease.

Serotyping of pneumococcal isolates can improve understanding of vaccine effects. However, serotyping is expensive and requires specialized reagents and extensive technical training; therefore, serotyping capacity is not widely available. The use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to identify pneumococcal capsular genes specific for individual capsular serotypes may be feasible for some state public health and academic research centers.[41], [42]

Pneumococcal surveillance enables recognition of new or rare resistance patterns. Surveillance information can be used on the national level for research and policy development and at the state or local level to raise awareness of DRSP among clinicians and the general public. Surveillance data also may be useful for tracking the impact of interventions aimed at reducing unnecessary use of antimicrobial agents.

Disease Reduction Goals

Healthy People 2010 included targeted goals for reduction in invasive pneumococcal disease among children and adults as well as reduction in penicillin-resistant pneumococcal disease among children.  Since the introduction of PCV7 into the childhood immunization schedule in 2000, a significant decrease in invasive pneumococcal disease among infants, children and adults has been observed.[20], [43] Among children aged <5 years, the incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease decreased by 74% between 1997 and 2008, from 77 to 22 new cases per 100,000 population, exceeding the 2010 target of 46 cases per 100,000.[44]  Among adults aged ≥65 years, the incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease decreased by 34% between 1997 and 2008, from 62 to 41 new cases per 100,000 population, exceeding the 2010 target of 42 per 100,000.  The incidence of penicillin-resistant pneumococcal infections among young children aged <5 years declined by 56% between 1997 and 2008, from 16 to 7 new cases per 100,000 moving toward the target of 6 cases per 100,000.[44

Healthy People 2020 includes additional targets for reducing invasive pneumococcal disease in the coming years.[45]  Target reduction goals for children aged <5 years and adults aged ≥65 years are 12 and 31 IPD cases per 100,000 respectively.  In addition, Healthy People 2020 includes a target goal to decrease penicillin-resistant pneumococcal infections among children aged <5 years and adults aged ≥65 years to 3 and 2 cases per 100,000 respectively.  Continuous surveillance is important to evaluate the impact of PCV13 on the incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease, antibiotic-resistant pneumococcal infections, and to monitor disease caused by pneumococcal serotypes not included in PCV13 (i.e., replacement disease).

Disease reduction goals also focus on minimizing complications of DRSP infections through prevention and control measures.  Geographic differences in antibiotic prescribing practices have been described.[46]  In sites where antibiotic prescribing is high, the proportion of nonsusceptible IPD is also high, suggesting that local prescribing practices may contribute to local resistance patterns.

In 1995, the CDC launched a national campaign to reduce antimicrobial resistance through promotion of appropriate antibiotic use. Initial efforts targeted the pediatric population and later expanded to adults.  CDC surveys have shown that there is a perception among providers that patient expectations may encourage overuse of antibiotics.  To overcome this, patient education resources were developed and are now available to aid in physician-patient communication.  The program also works closely with a small number of state and local health departments to address appropriate antibiotic use in their communities.  Formative research is currently underway to explore provider and patient knowledge and attitudes related to factors influencing antibiotic choices made by providers.

Case Definition

Case definitions for drug resistant S. pneumoniae (DRSP) and invasive pneumococcal disease were originally approved by the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) in 1994 and 2000, respectively. [47], [48] They were modified in 2006 to prevent duplicate reporting of individual cases.[49]  The definition was further modified in 2009 to include all invasive pneumococcal disease, regardless of drug resistance or the case patient’s age.  Beginning in 2010, the following definitions are in use for national reporting in the U.S.[50]

Confirmed: Isolation of S. pneumoniae from a normally sterile site (e.g., blood, cerebrospinal fluid, or, less commonly, joint, pleural or pericardial fluid).  (Event code 11723)

Suspected: The absence of the above criterion and either a medical record containing a diagnosis of invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae disease or death certificate listing invasive S. pneumoniae disease as the cause or a contributing cause of death.

Confirmed and suspected cases of invasive pneumococcal disease should be reported to public health authorities within one week of diagnosis.  CSTE also recommends certain clinical and epidemiological information be collected, including date of illness onset, clinical syndrome (e.g., pneumonia, meningitis), underlying medical conditions, and pneumococcal vaccination history. DRSP is no longer collected in national surveillance as a separate event from invasive pneumococcal disease.[50]

Laboratory Testing

Definitive diagnosis of pneumococcal infection is confirmed by the recovery of S. pneumoniae from a normally sterile body site (e.g., blood, CSF, pleural fluid, or peritoneal fluid). Because pneumococci frequently colonize the upper respiratory tract in the absence of disease, the clinical significance of recovering the organism from nonsterile body sites (e.g., expectorated sputum, conjunctiva) is less certain. Gram stain may be helpful in interpreting cultures of expectorated sputum; finding a predominance of gram-positive diplococci and > 25 leukocytes with < 10 epithelial cells per high power field on microscopic examination supports the diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia, but does not satisfy the case definition for national surveillance for invasive pneumococcal disease.  Also, detection of pneumococcal capsular antigen in urine is useful for the diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia in adults.

Based on recommendations from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, formerly the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, or NCCLS), clinical laboratories should test all isolates of S. pneumoniae from CSF for resistance to penicillin and cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, or meropenem, and vancomycin.[51]  Penicillin susceptibility breakpoints were recently changed for nonmeningitis isolates, resulting in somewhat lower proportions of nonmeningeal isolates characterized as nonsusceptible.[52] For organisms from other sources, laboratories should consider testing for resistance to erythromycin, penicillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, clindamycin, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, meropenem, tetracycline, vancomycin, and a fluoroquinolone such as levofloxacin. Pneumococci resistant to vancomycin or linezolid have never been described.  For vancomycin, a strain is considered non-susceptible if it has a minimum inhibitory concentration of > 1 µg/ml or zone diameter < 17 mm.  For linezolid, nonsusceptible strains are those with a minimum inhibitory concentration of > 2 µg/ml or zone diameter <21 mm.  Strains found to be nonsusceptible to vancomycin or linezolid should be submitted to a reference laboratory for confirmatory testing, and if resistant, reported to the state health department.[51]  Because pneumococci are fastidious organisms, some susceptibility testing methods used for other organisms are not appropriate for pneumococci (see the CLSI document for testing recommendations).[51]

Currently licensed vaccines target a limited number of pneumococcal polysaccharide capsule serotypes. Identifying the serotypes of pneumococcal strains can be useful for evaluating outbreaks of pneumococcal disease such as those that occur in institutional settings. Serotyping is currently performed in only a limited number of state public health laboratories, academic centers, or at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC’s Streptococcal Reference Laboratory will conduct serotyping of pneumococcal isolates from blood, CSF or other sterile sites in outbreak settings.  State public health laboratories might consider adopting a PCR-based technique for determining capsular serotypes.[41], [42] CDC’s Streptococcal Reference Laboratory provides numerous references and protocols for interested state public health laboratories.

Reporting

Each state and territory has regulations and laws governing the reporting of diseases and conditions of public health importance.[53] These regulations and laws list the diseases that are to be reported, and describe those persons or institutions responsible for reporting, such as health-care providers, hospitals, laboratories, schools, daycare and childcare facilities, and other institutions.  Detailed information on reportable conditions in each state is available through the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists.[54]

Reporting to CDC

Most states currently require invasive pneumococcal disease to be reported to local or state health authorities, regardless of the age of the case or drug resistance.  Additional states require reporting in limited populations, such as children <5 years of age.  Confirmed and suspected cases of IPD should be reported to state or local health departments by clinicians, laboratories, hospitals, and pharmacies.  Cases should be identified through microbiology laboratories, death certificates, hospital discharge or outpatient records, and electronic medical records. The following data are recommended for case investigation and reporting: patient’s date of birth or age, the anatomic site of specimen collection, and type of infection. Other epidemiological information that is useful includes patient’s gender, race and ethnicity, specimen collection date, whether the patient was hospitalized, clinical syndrome, antibiotic susceptibility, details of pneumococcal vaccination history, underlying medical conditions, daycare attendance, and outcome. Additional information may be collected at the direction of the state health department. The S. pneumoniae Surveillance Worksheet is included as Appendix 13. Confirmed cases of IPD should be reported using event code 11723 in the National Electronic Telecommunications System for Surveillance (NETSS).[50]

Vaccination

13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13)

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends that the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) be used for all children aged <5 years.[55]  For routine immunization of infants, PCV13 is recommended as a 4-dose series at age 2, 4, 6, and 12-15 months.[1]  Infants and children who have received ≥1 dose of PCV7 should complete the immunization series with PCV13.  A single supplemental dose of PCV13 is recommended for all children aged 14–59 months who have received 4 doses of PCV7 or another age-appropriate, complete PCV7 schedule. For children who have underlying medical conditions, a supplemental PCV13 dose is recommended through age 71 months. Children aged 2–18 years with underlying medical conditions should also receive PPSV23 after completing all recommended doses of PCV13.

In addition, a single dose of PCV13 may be administered to children aged 6-18 years who are at increased risk for IPD because of sickle cell disease, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or other immunocompromising condition, cochlear implant, or cerebrospinal fluid leaks, regardless of whether they have previously received PCV7 or PPSV23.[55] Routine use of PCV13 is not recommended for healthy children aged ≥5 years.

23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23)

PPV23 is approximately 56%–75% efficacious for the prevention of invasive pneumococcal infection caused by vaccine serotypes.[56], [57] Children aged ≥ 2 years with underlying medical conditions should receive PPV at least 8 weeks after completing all recommended doses of PCV13.[1]  A dose of PPV should be administered to all persons aged 5-64 years at increased risk of serious pneumococcal infection because of underlying medical conditions and to all persons ³ 65 years of age.[5

A single revaccination after at least 3–5 years (3 years if < 10 years of age, 5 years if 10 or more years of age) should be considered for persons aged ³ 2 to 64 years who are at highest risk or likely to have rapid declines in antibody levels. This includes those with functional or anatomic asplenia, HIV infection, leukemia, lymphoma, Hodgkin’s disease, multiple myeloma, generalized malignancy, chronic renal failure, nephrotic syndrome or immunosuppression (e.g., organ transplants or receiving chemotherapy).  Previously vaccinated persons should be revaccinated at 65 years of age or older, providing at least 5 years has passed since the first dose. Pneumococcal vaccine may be administered concurrently with influenza vaccine by separate injection in the opposite arm.

Enhancing Surveillance

Several surveillance activities may improve the detection and reporting of pneumococcal disease and the quality of the reports.

Establishing reporting of all invasive pneumococcal disease in young children

CSTE has recommended reporting of all invasive pneumococcal disease in children aged <5 years to monitor the impact of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine for this age group; to track progress toward Healthy People 2020 objectives; to monitor drug resistance among pneumococci, and; to assist public health jurisdictions in raising awareness of vaccine recommendations.

Enhancing reporting of Antibiotic Susceptibility Results

Concern over rising resistance to antibiotics has prompted many state health departments to increase their focus on reporting susceptibility results. CDC has worked with state health departments to evaluate different surveillance methods to determine which methods would enhance the reliability of surveillance data, given certain goals and resource limitations.[58] Use of aggregated antibiogram data collected from all hospital laboratories in an area has been shown to give a relatively accurate description of the proportion of isolates that are resistant to penicillin and a limited number of other drugs, [59] but such data typically cannot be analyzed by age group or other factors of interest. Sentinel systems, which may collect individual reports with more details from a limited number of laboratories, can give an accurate view of resistance if designed well. [60]

Encouraging provider reporting

Most states’ infectious disease surveillance systems depend upon the receipt of case reports from health-care providers and laboratories.  These data are often incomplete and may not be representative of certain populations; completeness of reporting has been estimated to vary from 6% to 90% for many of the common notifiable diseases.[53]  Therefore, it is important to educate providers about which events should be reported, and about how accurate reporting is critical to control of communicable diseases.  Increasing provider awareness of local rates of IPD and local reporting requirements may enhance surveillance.

Improving detection of DRSP in laboratories by promoting optimal techniques and appropriate interpretive standards

Because pneumococci are fastidious organisms, laboratory methods that are appropriate for some organisms are not appropriate for pneumococci.[61] In addition, many laboratories are not monitoring resistance to some agents that are widely used for suspected pneumococcal infections, such as fluoroquinolone agents.[24] Universal adoption of optimal testing methods and testing for resistance to recommended antibiotics would improve our ability to detect and monitor resistant pathogens.

Streamlining reporting using electronic methods

Many surveillance systems still rely on paper and pencil for data collection; use of electronic data transferred directly from clinical laboratories significantly improves reporting speed and data quality as well as reduces workload. Efforts are underway to implement electronic reporting, including the creation of a CSTE/CDC Joint Electronic Laboratory Reporting Taskforce.[62]

Case Investigation

As with most respiratory pathogens, rapid, sensitive, and specific diagnostic tests are not available; thus, early in the course of illness, diagnosis of S. pneumoniae infection is usually presumptive and the choice of antimicrobial therapy is nearly always empiric. However, once S. pneumoniae is isolated from a normally sterile body site, antimicrobial susceptibility testing may be necessary for patient management. Case investigations are not usually warranted, except in outbreaks or as determined by the state health department. CDC is available during outbreaks to assist with epidemiologic and laboratory investigations.


References

  1. Nuorti JP, Whitney CG. Prevention of pneumococcal disease among infants and children – use of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine – recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010; 59(RR-11): 1-18.
  2. Thigpen MC, Whitney CG, Messonnier NE, Zell ER, Lynfield R, Hadler JL, et al. Bacterial meningitis in the United States, 1998-2007. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364(21): 2016-25.
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. ABCs Report: Streptococcus Pneumoniae.  2010  [cited 2011 December]; Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/abcs/index.htm
  4. Robinson KA, Baughman W, Rothrock G, Barrett NL, Pass M, Lexau C, et al. Epidemiology of invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae infections in the United States, 1995-1998: Opportunities for prevention in the conjugate vaccine era. JAMA. 2001; 285(13): 1729-35.
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevention of pneumococcal disease. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 1997; 46(RR-8): 1-20.
  6. Dowell SF, Marcy SM, Phillips WR, Gerber MA, Schwartz B. Otitis Media—Principles of Judicious Use of Antimicrobial Agents. Pediatrics. 1998; 101: 165-71.
  7. Block SL, Hedrick J, Harrison CJ, Tyler R, Smith A, Findlay R, et al. Community-wide vaccination with the heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate significantly alters the microbiology of acute otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2004; 23(9): 829-33.
  8. Casey JR, Pichichero ME. Changes in frequency and pathogens causing acute otitis media in 1995-2003. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2004; 23(9): 824-8.
  9. Huang SS, Johnson KM, Ray GT, Wroe P, Lieu TA, Moore MR, et al. Healthcare utilization and cost of pneumococcal disease in the United States. Vaccine. 2011; 29(18): 3398-412.
  10. Bogaert D, De Groot R, Hermans PW. Streptococcus pneumoniae colonisation: the key to pneumococcal disease. Lancet Infect Dis. 2004; 4(3): 144-54.
  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Preventing pneumococcal disease among infants and young children: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR. 2000; 49(No. RR-9): 1-35.
  12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated recommendations for prevention of invasive pneumococcal disease among adults using the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23). MMWR. 2010; 59(34): 1102-6.
  13. Black S, Shinefield H, Fireman B, Lewis E, Ray P, Hansen JR, et al. Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in children. Northern California Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center Group. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000; 19(3): 187-95.
  14. Black SB, Shinefield HR, Ling S, Hansen J, Fireman B, Spring D, et al. Effectiveness of heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in children younger than five years of age for prevention of pneumonia. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2002; 21(9): 810-5.
  15. Eskola J, Kilpi T, Palmu A, Jokinen J, Haapakoski J, Herva E, et al. Efficacy of a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine against acute otitis media. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344(6): 403-9.
  16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated recommendation from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for use of 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) in children aged 24-59 months who are not completely vaccinated. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008; 57(13): 343-4.
  17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Licensure of a 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) and recommendations for use among children – Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2010. MMWR. 2010; 59(9): 258-61.
  18. Lexau CA, Lynfield R, Danila R, Pilishvili T, Facklam R, Farley MM, et al. Changing epidemiology of invasive pneumococcal disease among older adults in the era of pediatric pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. JAMA. 2005; 294(16): 2043-51.
  19. Moore MR, Pilishvili T, Bennett N, Hadler J, Thomas A, Farley MM, et al. Trends in invasive pneumococcal disease among adults, 1998-2004: implications for conjugate vaccine development.  International Conference on Emerging Infectious Diseases; 2006; Atlanta, GA; 2006.
  20. Whitney CG, Farley MM, Hadler J, Harrison LH, Bennett NM, Lynfield R, et al. Decline in Invasive Pneumococcal Disease after the Introduction of Protein-Polysaccharide Conjugate Vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348(18): 1737-46.
  21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Direct and indirect effects of routine vaccination of children with 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease–United States, 1998-2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005; 54(36): 893-7.
  22. Flannery B, Heffernan RT, Harrison LH, Ray SM, Reingold AL, Hadler J, et al. Changes in invasive pneumococcal disease among HIV-infected adults living in the era of childhood pneumococcal immunization. Ann Intern Med. 2006; 144(1): 1-9.
  23. Whitney CG, Farley MM, Hadler J, Harrison LH, Lexau C, Reingold A, et al. Increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343(26): 1917-24.
  24. Pletz MW, McGee L, Jorgensen J, Beall B, Facklam RR, Whitney CG, et al. Levofloxacin-resistant invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States: evidence for clonal spread and the impact of conjugate pneumococcal vaccine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004; 48(9): 3491-7.
  25. Butler JC, Hofmann J, Cetron MS, Elliott JA, Facklam RR, Breiman RF. The continued emergence of drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States: an update from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Pneumococcal Sentinel Surveillance System. J Infect Dis. 1996; 174(5): 986-93.
  26. Breiman RF, Butler JC, Tenover FC, Elliott JA, Facklam RR. Emergence of drug-resistant pneumococcal infections in the United States. JAMA. 1994; 271(23): 1831-5.
  27. Kyaw MH, Lynfield R, Schaffner W, Craig AS, Hadler J, Reingold A, et al. Effect of introduction of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine on drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354(14): 1455-63.
  28. Kaplan SL, Mason EO, Jr., Wald ER, Schutze GE, Bradley JS, Tan TQ, et al. Decrease of invasive pneumococcal infections in children among 8 children’s hospitals in the United States after the introduction of the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. Pediatrics. 2004; 113(3 Pt 1): 443-9.
  29. Stephens DS, Zughaier SM, Whitney CG, Baughman WS, Barker L, Gay K, et al. Incidence of macrolide resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae after introduction of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine: population-based assessment. Lancet. 2005; 365(9462): 855-63.
  30. Talbot TR, Poehling KA, Hartert TV, Arbogast PG, Halasa NB, Mitchel E, et al. Reduction in high rates of antibiotic-nonsusceptible invasive pneumococcal disease in Tennessee after introduction of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. Clin Infect Dis. 2004; 39(5): 641-8.
  31. Hampton LM, Farley MM, Schaffner W, Thomas A, Reingold A, Harrison LH, et al. Prevention of Antibiotic-Nonsusceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae With Conjugate Vaccines. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2011.
  32. tional Supplement.  CLSI Document M100-S18. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2008.
  33. Bradley JS, Byington CL, Shah SS, Alverson B, Carter ER, Harrison C, et al. The management of community-acquired pneumonia in infants and children older than 3 months of age: clinical practice guidelines by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2011; 53(7): e25-76.
  34. American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Effusion aAAoPSoOMw. Otitis media with effusion. Pediatrics. 2004; 113(5): 1412-29.
  35. American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and American Academy of Pediatrics: Subcommittee on Management of Acute Otitis Media. Diagnosis and management of acute otitis media. Pediatrics. 2004; 113(5): 1451-65.
  36. Mandell LA, Bartlett JG, Dowell SF, File TM, Jr., Musher DM, Whitney C. Update of practice guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompetent adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2003; 37(11): 1405-33.
  37. Dowell S, Marcy S, Phillips W, Gerber M, Schwartz B. Priniciples of judicious use of antimicrobial agents for pediatric upper respiratory tract infections. Pediatr. 1998; 101(1): 163-5.
  38. Gonzales R, Bartlett JG, Besser RE, Cooper RJ, Hickner JM, Hoffman JR, et al. Principles of appropriate antibiotic use for treatment of uncomplicated acute bronchitis: background. Ann Intern Med. 2001; 134(6): 521-9.
  39. Gonzales R, Bartlett JG, Besser RE, Cooper RJ, Hickner JM, Hoffman JR, et al. Principles of appropriate antibiotic use for treatment of acute respiratory tract infections in adults: background, specific aims, and methods. Ann Intern Med. 2001; 134(6): 479-86.
  40. Gonzales R, Bartlett JG, Besser RE, Hickner JM, Hoffman JR, Sande MA. Principles of appropriate antibiotic use for treatment of nonspecific upper respiratory tract infections in adults: background. Ann Intern Med. 2001; 134(6): 490-4.
  41. Pai R, Gertz RE, Beall B. Sequential Multiplex PCR Approach for Determining Capsular Serotypes of Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2006; 44(1): 124-31.
  42. Pai R, Limor J, Beall B. Use of pyrosequencing to differentiate Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes 6A and 6B. J Clin Microbiol. 2005; 43(9): 4820-2.
  43. Pilishvili T, Moore M, Lynfield R, Hadler J, Reingold A, Farley MM, et al. Invasive Pneumococcal Disease in Children Four Years Following the Introduction of the Conjugate Vaccine: an Update from Active Bacterial Core Surveillance (ABCs).  International Conference on Emerging Infectious Diseases; 2006; Atlanta, Georgia; 2006.
  44. CDC. Healthy People 2010 Final Review.   [cited 2012 January]; Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/healthy_people/hp2010/hp2010_final_review.htm
  45. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2020 – Improving the Health of Americans.   [cited 2012 March]; Available from: www.healthypeople.govExternal Web Site Icon
  46. Hicks LA, Chien YW, Taylor TH, Jr., Haber M, Klugman KP. Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing and Nonsusceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States, 1996-2003. Clin Infect Dis. 2011; 53(7): 631-9.
  47. Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists. National surveillance for drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (DRSP) invasive disease.  Position Statement 1994-10; 1994.
  48. Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists. Surveillance for invasive pneumococcal disease in children less than five years of age.  Position Statement 2000-6; 2000.
  49. Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists. Enhancing local, state and territorial-based surveillance for invasive pneumococcal disease in children less than five years of age.  Position Statement 2006-14; 2006.
  50. Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists. Enhancing state-based surveillance for invasive pneumococcal disease.  Position State 09-ID-06; 2009.
  51. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-First Informational Supplement.  CLSI Document M100-S21. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2011.
  52. Weinstein MP, Klugman KP, Jones RN. Rationale for revised penicillin susceptibility breakpoints versus Streptococcus pneumoniae: coping with antimicrobial susceptibility in an era of resistance. Clin Infect Dis. 2009; 48(11): 1596-600.
  53. Roush S, Birkhead G, Koo D, Cobb A, Fleming D. Mandatory reporting of diseases and conditions by health care professionals and laboratories. JAMA. 1999; 282(2): 164-70.
  54. Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists. State Reportable Conditions Websites.  2011  [cited 2011 October]; Available from: http://www.cste.orgExternal Web Site Icon.
  55. Mung K, Renamy B, Vely JF, Magloire R, Wells N, Ferguson J, et al. Licensure of a 13-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV13) and Recommendations for Use Among Children-Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2010 (Reprinted from vol 59, pg 258-261, 2010). Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association. 2010; 303(20): 2026-8.
  56. Butler JC, Breiman RF, Campbell JF, Lipman HB, Broome CV, Facklam RR. Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine efficacy. An evaluation of current recommendations. JAMA. 1993; 270(15): 1826-31.
  57. Shapiro ED, Berg AT, Austrian R, Schroeder D, Parcells V, Margolis A, et al. The protective efficacy of polyvalent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine [see comments]. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325(21): 1453-60.
  58. Noggle B, Iwamoto M, Chiller T, Klevens M, Moore M, Wright J, et al. Tracking resistant organisms: Workshop for improving state-based surveillance programs [conference summary]. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]  2006 November [cited 2012 March]; Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol12no03/05-1335.htm
  59. Van Beneden CA, Lexau C, Baughman W, Barnes B, Bennett N, Cassidy PM, et al. Aggregated antibiograms and monitoring of drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003; 9(9): 1089-95.
  60. Schrag SJ, Zell ER, Schuchat A, Whitney CG. Sentinel surveillance: a reliable way to track antibiotic resistance in communities? Emerg Infect Dis. 2002; 8(5): 496-502.
  61. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Fifteenth Informational Supplement.  Approved standard M100-S15. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2005.
  62. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Progress in improving state and local disease surveillance–United States, 2000-2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005; 54(33): 822-5.


Email This Post Email This Post

Comments Off

April 30th, 2012 posted by Paul Rega, MD, FACEP @ 12:03 am

(Audio) On this date in 1888: Hellacious Hail

Uncategorized



Email This Post Email This Post

Comments Off

April 30th, 2012 posted by Paul Rega, MD, FACEP @ 12:02 am

Weather: Live!

Uncategorized

 

 

 



Email This Post Email This Post

Comments Off

April 29th, 2012 posted by Paul Rega, MD, FACEP April 29, 2012 @ 11:54 am

Death at the Nigerian church services

Uncategorized

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/apr/29/nigeria-gunmen-kill-churchgoers

Gunmen kill 16 at Nigerian church services

Attackers drove worshippers out of theatre with explosives packed in drink cans, a method associated with Boko Haram

Associated Press in Kano

“….The attackers targeted an old section of Bayero University’s campus where religious groups use a theatre and other areas…..who said the assault left many others seriously wounded…..”



Email This Post Email This Post

Comments Off

April 29th, 2012 posted by Paul Rega, MD, FACEP @ 11:49 am

FEMA 4/29/12 Briefing

Uncategorized

Read


Email This Post Email This Post

Comments Off



Get Macromedia Flash Player

Flash Player Uninstaller - uninstall if you have trouble updating or installing the new flash player, then try to install the flash player again
Syndicate this site using RSS RSS Feed
FindBlogs.com

Conditions and Diseases Blog Directory

ProjectDisaster at Blogged